Filed under: Majors, Strategy | Tags: Cleveland Indians, Fantasy Baseball, First Basemen, James Loney, Los Angeles Dodgers, Ryan Garko
There are many fantasy owners who are unable to secure the high priced talent at the top of the first base rankings and either by choice or forced necessity, look towards sleeper candidates at one of the deepest positions for talent in fantasy baseball. We continue our Sleeper Showdown series with a look at a couple first baseman who certainly qualify as sleepers this season, the Indians’ Ryan Garko and Dodgers James Loney.
1B Ryan Garko, Indians (Last Two Years)
| Year | G | AB | AVG | R | HR | RBI | SB | OBP | SLG | OPS |
| 2006 | 50 | 185 | .292 | 28 | 7 | 45 | 0 | .359 | .470 | .829 |
| 2007 | 138 | 484 | .289 | 62 | 21 | 61 | 0 | .359 | .483 | .842 |
1B James Loney, Dodgers (Last Two Years)
| Year | G | AB | AVG | R | HR | RBI | SB | OBP | SLG | OPS |
| 2006 | 48 | 102 | .284 | 20 | 4 | 18 | 1 | .342 | .559 | .901 |
| 2007 | 96 | 344 | .331 | 41 | 15 | 67 | 0 | .381 | .538 | .919 |
The Tribe is long removed from employing slugger Jim Thome at first base and last year they finally moved past the Ben Broussard experiment–something that was long overdue. That gave Garko an opportunity for a full plate of at bats for the first time in his career, and he was fairly productive with those plate appearances, hitting .289 with 21 dingers, 62 runs, and 61 RBI in 484 at bats.
Meanwhile out West, Loney has been a highly regarded prospect for what seems like forever, and the Dodgers have gone out of their way to block his path to the majors with a washed up Nomar Garciaparra and mediocre prospects like Hee Seop Choi over the last three seasons. He got multiple tastes of the bigs last season, but when the Dodgers finally took off the training wheels and let him ride, they were rewarded with a .382 average, nine homers, and 32 RBI in 118 September at bats. Nobody in major league baseball drove in more runs that month. Not even Alex Rodriguez (who had 31 RBI) or Matt Holliday (who had 30 RBI).
So who justifies fantasy owners investment more in 2008? Both players are expected to be the starting first basemen for their respective teams when they break camp. Both are surrounded by other offensive threats in their respective lineups. In Garko’s case, reasons for optimism include a solid contact rate and an increasing fly ball rate that, combined with a significant number of doubles (his 29 was tied for 18th among 1b with slugger Carlos Pena) suggests further growth in the power department. On Loney’s side of the argument you have the fact that throughout his professional career he’s hit for a good-to-great average at almost every stop and while his upside in the power department probably isn’t as high as Garko’s, he has a more consistent approach at the plate as seen by his steady contact rate (over 80 in each of the last four combined major/minor league seasons).
This is a VERY close showdown and I’ll honestly admit that when I started writing it I was hoping the evidence would point to Garko. I think he’s the guy with potential to club 30 bombs and I’m a little worried that Loney’s not so quiet finish to the 2007 season has resulted in the hype this spring driving up his price at draft or auction tables everywhere. Assuming the bidding for his services doesn’t get out of hand, I FAVOR LONEY IN THIS SHOWDOWN for the simple fact that he’s less likely to fail and at this point seems to be the favorite between this talented tandem to have a higher average, RBI total, and stolen base total all while clubbing nearly as many long balls and scoring almost as many runs as his Cleveland counterpart.
2 Comments so far
Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


I comment about this everywhere Loney’s name comes up, maybe cause I don’t want him to be a sleeper, maybe so I can say ‘I told you so’ (this is fantasy baseball) — I don’t know. Either way, anyone who happens to read anything about James Loney on the internet where there happens to a comment box just might have seen this already.
I’ll try to condense this this time, though:
1.) Loney’s prorated stats are better than Adrian Gonzalez’s. Loney was also much better than Gonzalez is the time the two played simultaneously. Everyone loves “Yo!” Adrian, and for good reason. Modus Pollendo Ponens…
Alright, that’s not a very fair comparison, and nor is it useful. But…
2.)According to Bill James’ website, Loney’s ‘Batting Performance By Quality of Opposing Pitcher’ splits in 2007 went like this:
Vs. pitcher with ERA less than/= 3.50 - 91 AB, .319/6/19/.950 OPS
…which was comparable to the number of at-bats he got in the next two higher levels (93 in 3.51 to 4.25, 104 in 4.26 to 5.25).
In that same category (vs. ERA less than/= 3.50), Gonzalez, in 129 AB (!), went .240/5/14/.721.
Furthermore, the numbers for the top-five first basemen (based on a few different lists that I may or may not agree with) are as follows:
Ortiz - 109 AB, .193/5/17/.631
Howard - 117 AB, .256/4/19/.833
Pujols - 111 AB, .270/7/19/.892
Fielder - 110 AB, .182/6/12/.682
Teixeira - 85 AB, .259/4/12/.790
While I’d have to take the time to see who it was exactly, Loney seemed to have his way with good pitching in ‘07, and to an extent that, out of the top-5 first baseman going into 2008, only Albert Pujols had comparable numbers (in 20 more at-bats).
(And, so not to seem like I’m emphasizing his numbers unfairly, Loney’s numbers against other pitching levels were as follows: vs. ERA 3.51-4.25, .280/3/16/.801, vs. 4.26-5.25, .346/4/21/.903, and vs. over/= 5.25, .389/2/11/1.063.)
I know; Loney was never scathing in the minor leagues, nor would he seem all that impressive in his 102 AB in 2006 (besides that fun 9 RBI game in Colorado).
For what it’s worth, though, out of those 102 ‘06 at-bats, 22 were against ERA less than/= 3.50 pitchers. Loney hit .409 with an OPS over 1.000, the best of any of his performance ranges. The guy who was just ‘good’ against minor league hurlers has been ‘nasty’ against the best of the MLB in his first 446 major league at-bats. I’ll gladly take him over Konerko or Helton, and in Round 6 if need be.
(For what that’s worth, I’ve gotten Loney from 110-120 (9th/10th round) in every mock or draft I’ve done so far, and as a backup, so he hasn’t been that expensive.)
Comment by Dan Lowe March 10, 2008 @ 11:26 pmDan- I appreciate the great stats and comment! Yeah, after breaking apart the numbers last night, there is simply no way Garko is in Loney’s class. I still believe Garko has more HR upside, but that is the only possible, miniscule edge he has over a far superior first baseman in Loney.
Comment by cbracke March 11, 2008 @ 6:09 am